Intel P-Core and E-Core

Intel P-Core and E-Core
Intel P-Core and E-Core

The idea of having different kinds of processor cores in Intel P-Core and E-Core on the same CPU package isn’t new by any means. ARM-based mobile CPUs have been doing this for years.

Intel has announced the hybrid architecture of its 12th-generation Alder Lake processors that feature both Intel P-Core and E-Core to achieve optimal system performance.

Intel P-Cores and E-Cores work seamlessly together to handle both the foreground single-threaded tasks, as well as background multithreading assignments assigned by a hardware scheduler called Thread Director.

This is achieved by assigning appropriate E-Cores to handle the multithreading capability of the foreground workloads and pairing them with the performance P-Cores for the best possible high single-threaded throughput.

A hybrid architecture like this isn’t new and you might have seen similar implementations in Kaby Lake processors as well. However, those designs were implemented with hardware alone and required the software to run in a specific compatibility mode.

For example, when running Windows in legacy mode on Kaby Lake processors, you can see four different cores instead of two in your task manager.

What is P – core :

A Performance Core (P-Core) is a type of high-performance CPU core based on the Golden Cove microarchitecture designed to handle heavy single-threaded workloads optimized for speed.

P-Cores are a type of high-performance CPU core that optimizes for single-threaded workloads and often handle the most demanding foreground tasks.

What is E – core :

An Efficient CPU Core (E-Core) is a power efficiency-focused core based on the Gracemont microarchitecture that handles lower priority multi-threaded workloads to optimize performance and reduce lag.

For the ultimate in efficiency and power, there’s an E-Core for you! It can handle lower priority workloads with ease to keep your computer running at top speeds.

Working of P-core and E-core together :

Intel in Intel P-Core and E-Core wanted to get the best of both worlds with its new architecture.

They are using P-Cores for heavy calculations, while also including E-Core processors which offer lower latency and higher bandwidth when needed.

A conventional task assignment method would not deliver the best performance latency and efficiency-wise.

The Intel Thread Director is a software layer that provides the operating system with an accurate picture of how each core in your processor has been executing.

The thread director has the power to move a less critical task from one core in order for more important ones.

The thread director technology constantly reallocates the critical tasks to each core in order to make sure that they are operating at their peak.

The good thing about this system is that the software doesn’t have to be rewritten for it to work since it’s a layered approach.

How Intel P-core and E-core works :

The task scheduler constantly looks at each core in your CPU and assigns every thread on its own core in order to find out which ones.

This shows how dynamic it is, with no two cores being stagnant for even one second! This can be seen as an improvement on previous methods of thread management.

This is a great step forward for multi-core processor design.

Allowing the software to assign tasks dynamically will make it more efficient, and help prolong battery life by reducing power consumption.

Differences between a P-Core and E-Core :

Differences between a P-Core and E-Core
Differences between a P-Core and E-Core

Function –

The idea of cores is that they can be assigned to handle different tasks.
A P-Core handles the heavy work like running programs while an E-Core does more delicate things like maintaining your data and system settings without getting bogged down in doing so.

Workload –

The difference between a P-Core and an E-Core is the number of cores.
The more powerful one has, the better it will be at handling single-threaded workloads while sacrificing its efficiency for tasks that require multi-threads such as gaming or real-time applications like video editing software.

Uses –

The right cores can make or break your system. P-cores help ensures that it’s running at its optimal performance level, while E-Cores are useful for power efficiency.

Architectural Design –

The reason for this difference lies in the architecture. P-Core designs are built on a Golden Cove platform while E-Cores have Gracemont’s signature features, such as an offset core with concentric pistons and connecting rods that create stronger joints between plates due to their design strength compared to flat engine blocks found in most vehicles today.

Single-threaded performance –

In single-threaded applications, a P-Core (Golden Cove) delivers 50% greater performance than E-Cores within the same die area and power package.

Similarities between a P-Core and E-Core :

Number of cores –

There are eight performance cores and eight efficient ones working together in Alder Lake’s CPU.

Improvements –

The Golden Cove P-Cores and Gracemont E-Cores have been handed significant upgrades that make them perform better than their predecessors.
According to Intel, the P-Cores guarantee 19% more Instructions per Cycle (IPC) than its predecessor “Cypress Cove” while E-Cores delivers 40% more performance than Skylake core.

Principle of working –

The P-Cores and the E-Cores are given tasks by the operating system scheduler after Intel’s thread director provides accurate information.

Capability –

The P-Core and E-Cores are two separate cores that can handle single or multi-threaded tasks respectively.
The design of these chips has been optimized so each core is able to perform efficiently in either type, but they’re especially well suited for handling both types at once.

Conclusion :

If you are looking for an improvement in performance, go with Golden Cove.

If you are concerned about power consumption and want to save battery life, then Gracemont is the way to go.

Otherwise, you will get better results by using both cores together at once than just one or the other alone.

The use of both cores gives the user more flexibility in power management and performance.

There are eight cores on each chip, so you can bet that it’s going to be better than single-core processors!

However, it does depend on your daily tasks. If you spend most of your time playing games or watching videos, then this processor is probably not for you.

If you work with spreadsheets and store a lot of data on your computer, choose the one that can do everything you need efficiently.

With this processor, there is no longer a need to decide between single or multi-core processors since it combines both advantages.

Thank you for sticking around!

Leave a Comment